The savings illusion--why clinical quality improvement fails to deliver bottom-line results.
نویسندگان
چکیده
10.1056/nejmp1111662 nejm.org e48(1) into clinical processes will reduce resource utilization and thereby lower costs. Certainly, evidence suggests that there is no association between high quality and high costs.1 Yet true bottom-line savings from improved clinical quality rarely materialize, and costs continue to climb. Manufacturing and service companies around the world have demonstrated the cost benefits of improving product quality and production efficiency. So why haven’t nearly two decades of work on improving health care quality had a measurable effect on health care costs? The explanation lies in the cost structure of the typical health care setting. Its management and organization create a rigid cost structure that is relatively insensitive to small changes in patient volume, resource use, or the severity of patients’ health conditions. This fixed-cost dilemma leaves most health care costs insensitive to changes in volume and utilization, so clinical quality improvements typically create additional capacity rather than bottom-line savings.2 An examination of the different cost layers highlights the distinction between variable costs, such as supplies and medications, where reduced use produces true savings, and fixed costs, such as facilities and ancillary services, where the costs persist despite reduced use. To better understand the cost structure of health care delivery, it can be useful to consider how different costs behave depending on the degree to which they are sensitive to changes in resource utilization. The four cost layers we have identified are defined in the table. Clinical improvements that reduce layer 1 costs, such as those of supplies and medications, will generally create bottom-line savings, since these are the only truly variable clinical costs in a hospital. To generate savings by reducing use of the resources that account for layer 2 costs, the need for the resource must be reduced enough to allow elimination of a payable unit. For instance, a single nursing unit might have to The Savings Illusion — Why Clinical Quality Improvement Fails to Deliver Bottom-Line Results
منابع مشابه
Paying for Performance in Healthcare Organisations
Aligning Financial Incentives (FIs) to health policy goals is becoming increasingly popular. In many cases, such initiatives have failed to deliver anticipated benefits. Attributing this to the actions of self-interested and resistant professionals is not an entirely helpful approach. It is important to avoid simplistic assumptions to build knowledge of how and why schemes are implemented in pr...
متن کاملWhy the Critics of Poor Health Service Delivery Are the Causes of Poor Service Delivery: A Need to Train the Policy-makers; Comment on “Why and How Is Compassion Necessary to Provide Good Quality Healthcare?”
This comment on Professor Fotaki’s Editorial agrees with her arguments that training health professionals in more compassionate, caring and ethically sound care will have little value unless the system in which they work changes. It argues that for system change to occur, senior management, government members and civil servants themselves need training so that they learn to understand the effec...
متن کاملChemical energy and bottom stirring systems – Cost effective solutions for a better performing EAF
The continuous improvement of EAF performance is crucial for the increase in productivity and cost effectiveness and to render an environmental friendly process. RHI supports these targets by providing a diverse range of refractory and process solutions. Chemical energy in practical operation by injection of gaseous media like oxygen and natural gas, and solid materials like carbon have become ...
متن کاملDecentralisation – A Portmanteau Concept That Promises Much but Fails to Deliver?; Comment on “Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis”
Decentralisation has been described as an empty concept that lacks clarity. Yet there is an enduring interest in the process of decentralisation within health systems and public services more generally. Many claims about the benefits of decentralisation are not supported by evidence. It may be useful as an organising framework for analysis of health systems but in this context it lacks conceptu...
متن کاملنقش شش سیگما در بهبود کیفیت خدمات مؤسسات مراقبت بهداشتی
Introduction: Health Care organizations, because of their special nature of Medical Services, impossibility of assessment by customers, and increasing of patients and customer expectation, have to apply different management approach. In recent decade Six Sigma has been considered as systematic and powerful to improve service quality and cost saving. Six Sigma is a statistical and systematic app...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The New England journal of medicine
دوره 365 26 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011